This is my 2nd posting today. Why? I crashed my computer after completing my last blog. Gone, lost, bye bye. So I had to rewrite the entire posting. I’ve been working with computers since I was 15 years old, so with nearly 30 years of writing with computers, I am no stranger to crashes and loss. One of my first jobs as a software engineer was working for a company that did real time backups.
What made this blog, this writing, stick in my mind more than others in the past? The packers were winning, the baby was crying and my two older children were louder than the loudest sales rep at Broadlook (that is loud). The fact that I could get anything done today was an accomplishment. So I was proud to get anything done at all. When I lost it, I had to do a rewrite.
The rewrite took 1/4 the time that the original post took. The writing wasn’t as good.
This made me think of how important backups are. As I think back over the years, when I lost something in a crash, the rewrites were never as good. I’m not talking about revisions. Revisions can be much much better. A true rewrite is starting from scratch; you don’t have your orginal thoughts and inspiration, it tends to lack something. In addition, rewriting, after you lost your original, seems more like work than inspiration. Maybe that is why I am writing this post. I can’t end the evening with a rewrite.
I’d love to hear the experiences of others. Orginal inspiration vs. rewrites..what are the attributes of each?
After reading about the new Google Android cell phone platform (the Gphone), it rekindled an idea that I had at a conference some time ago. Turns out there is no “phone” behind the gPhone. Instead it is an open source platform for cell phones.
About 2 years ago, I was a member of a technology panel at a recruiting conference. While one of my fellow panelist was finishing answering a question, a cell phone started ringing in the audience.
On most panels, audience questions naturally get directed to the right person; the panel learns quicky how to use each others expertise and take or defer questions as needed.
I got a question right after the cell phone rang. The specifics of the question, I do not remember. It was something about how to apply the right mix of technology in a recruitment process (right up my alley). A cell phone ringing 10 minutes after the event MC asked everyone to turn their phones off perturbed me.
With microphone in hand, I addressed the crowd. “I’m wondering if the people in the audience today heard the announcement about turning off cell phones. It is quite disturbing for the people on stage. I guess I don’t understand it. In the last 30 minutes, I’ve heard 4 cell phones.” Several people noticibly slinked down in their seats…most likely the offenders. The crowd was expecting that I was going to chastise them all.
In reality, I had an idea that I wanted to share with the audience: The no ring zone. The topic of the panel was technology in recruitment.
Here is a general idea of what I said
“We’ve been talking about the right application of technology and when to apply it. Here is a perfect example. What if there was a device set at the door of this conference, that when passed by, set cell phones to vibrate only? Call it a no ring zone. In high schools around the country, cell phones are being banned. As a parent, I want my children to be able to reach me and I want to be able to reach them. What if this same device could set high schools to parent only ring zones?”
I got a good deal of nodding heads, and a few emails from people over the last year about this idea. I’ve had good conversations about it and it always ends up with our agreement that unless there was some unifying standard behind the cell phones, we wouldn’t be seeing this feature any time soon.
Now that Google has the Android platform, we just need some developer to create a single application, make it free, and market it to speakers, conferences, high schools and parents. Not a bad little market.
At least 3-4 times per week, I get asked by recruiters for my recommendation of a preferred Applicant tracking system. In addition, another top question I am asked is for an example of how Broadlook’s software can be used in a real life recruiting, sales, or research process. Broadlook partners with many ATS vendors, so we do not recommend any one vendor. We will, however, provide a short list of 4-5 vendors based on what we know about the clients needs.
I’ve seen several recruiting industry “lists” of ATS vendors by various publications. The tone of the articles is typically one of inclusivity and completeness. This is far from accurate. Vendors get on the list by paying. Some vendors with great technology don’t make those lists. So I thought I would use Broadlook’s software tools to make my own list.
About the list. Total time to create this list: 4 hours.
Methodology used:
1. Broadlook’s Market Mapper to create the initial list of companies
2. Broadlook’s Profiler to scan the companies and pull out “descriptive paragraphs”
3. About 1 hour of manual editing
Any recruiter who is looking to build a list of companies in a niche industry goes through a laborious process of search engines queries, manual selection and cut & paste. To put a list like this together manually would take about 2 weeks. I was able to create this list in 4 hours…and during 2.5 of those hours the software was working alone. So the net was 1.5 hours of my time to create a list that had not existed before. Is it the definitive list? No. There will always be some holes in 100% automated processing. However, for those recruiters building lists of companies the old way in some niche, from scratch. Game over. I’ll beat you every time. I’ll be on the phone talking to passive canidates on day 2. In every phone call I’ll sound like I know every major player in their space. I’ll pick up several more job orders along the way and I’ll be sending candidates to multiple companies in similar spaces. Damn I wish I had this tool when I was recruiting. Now I can only live vicariously via my clients that give us high fives at recuiting conferences. For those of you who attended NAPS, thank you for stopping by the booth.
With the amazing success we’ve had with DIVER, I’ve been thinking about releasing a trial version of Market Mapper v3 when it is released (tool used to create the list). Here is the challenge: it is a POWER users tool. I’d welcome feedback from the community on the nature of getting a tool like this out. One thought I had is to have a mandatory training webinar. If you attend the webinar and learn how to use it, you get the trial. Feedback please. BTW.. Market Mapper version 3 rocks! Those who are fans will love the latest version. Nuff said…here is the Applicant tracking vendor list
http://www.broadlook.com/research/applicant_tracking_vendor_list
Assuming NO limitations on the technology what would internet researchers vote for as their top features to add to search engines?
Some of mine:
1. Access to all results. When I do a search and see 3500 results, and can only get to a maximum of 1000…ahhhhh
2. Some control over the business logic in the ranking algorythm. – to much popularity means too much mob mentality.
3. The ability to perform 2 searches and create a concordance of results in a 3rd search – Example get a list of all terms that have to do with JAVA and then perform a resume search with the entire list as an input into one of those complex search strings that all you souring gurus are fond of.
